March 22, 2006

Maywood: A Haven for Illegals?

The South LA area city of Maywood is an interesting anomaly.  Over 95% Hispanic, the city has openly vowed to make itself a "sanctuary city" for illegal immigrants.

First, the city eliminated the Police Department's traffic division after complaints that officers unfairly targeted illegal immigrants. Then it made it much more difficult for police to tow cars whose owners didn't have driver's licenses, a practice that affected mostly undocumented people who could not obtain licenses.

In January, the City Council passed a resolution opposing a proposed federal law that would criminalize illegal immigration and make local police departments enforce immigration law. Now, some in the community are pushing to rename one of the city's elementary schools after former Mexican President Benito Juarez and debating measures to improve the lives of illegal immigrants.

Maywood leaders say they hope their actions will serve as a counterpoint to other cities, such as Costa Mesa in Orange County, that have moved forward with crackdowns on illegal immigrants and groups like the Minutemen border patrols.

"You just couldn't keep quiet. I think we needed to amplify the debate by saying that no human being is illegal," said Councilman Felipe Aguirre, 53. "These people are here … making your clothes, shining your shoes and taking care of your kids. And now you want to develop this hypocritical policy?"

Interestingly, this also caused a deep rift in the Hispanic community itself.

The city was developed in the 1920s and '30s as a working-class bedroom community for factory workers of L.A.'s industrial belt. But like the neighboring cities of Bell Gardens and Huntington Park, Maywood saw an influx of immigration as the area's factories began to close in the 1970s.

The campaign for immigrant rights has its roots in a long-brewing political divide between newer immigrants and older immigrants, who consider themselves more "Americanized," said Ceballos, who came to the United States as an illegal immigrant from Jalisco, Mexico, 37 years ago and is a longtime Maywood political observer.

"Many people who came here a long time ago feel that they had to sacrifice a lot more and do with a lot less than people who come to the country now," Ceballos said.

This discord was evident at a recent City Council meeting. On one side sat a group of newer immigrants who addressed the council in Spanish. On the other side sat a few of the city's longtime Anglo residents and Latinos who spoke in English.

At one point, when Anglo resident Kathleen Larsen spoke out angrily against naming an elementary school after Juarez, the audience members sitting behind her applauded. Most of them were Latino, and many were immigrants.

Interesting how Us vs Them has a different meaning in different communities.

All that aside, Maywood authorities are being short-sighted. Cutting their traffic division and refusing to impound cars of unlicensed drivers are dangerous to all citizens, not just a help to illegals and their families. Furthermore, supporting illegal immigrants is a drain on all the surrounding communities. I wouldn't be surprised if they find themselves an a heap of trouble if this becomes their official policy....

Posted by caltechgirl at March 22, 2006 04:22 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Brilliant. Just farookin brilliant. What will they come up with next?

Posted by: oddybobo at March 22, 2006 04:45 PM

Well, first off, the LA County Sheriff has an obligation to step in and perform the municipal law-enforcment functions that Maywood is deliberating ignoring.

And second, Congress should ensure that no federal funds of any kind go to municipalities that actively undermine the immigration laws. Maywood is a poor city, but wants to have its cake and eat it too. Let's see how long it can manage to do that--or even wants to do that-- when it's TRULY on its own.

Finally, as a last resort, I would argue that the state legislature has plenary authority to void a city's charter and dissolve the city. The state constitution and statutes may not say so (California's don't), but unlike the feds, a state does not need to find express authority to act upon: it can do anything it's not forbidden from doing. The only legal argument against this that I can say is that doing so would impair the obligations of contract (here, treating the charter as a contract between the state and the electors of the city) in violation the federal Contracts Clause (and its state analog, which I see is Article I, Section 9 of the California Constitution).

Posted by: Dave J at March 22, 2006 09:06 PM

I'll research this a bit more tomorrow, but while the state of California can dissolve the city of Maywood ( or any other charter city) with relative ease, as a practical mater, it will not happen at this point. THere are better odds of Vernon being dissolved (and then subsequently annexed by the City of LA) than this happening.

For the record though, giving Lee Baca any more power and policing area is a bad thing. While not the area to go into tonight, he's had many questionable relationships in the past (read: writing the President to pardon drug dealers, reported on in the LA Times a few years ago), and is only seeking to increase his political empire. His threat each election to release criminals from jails because he does not have enough money to run the jails, unless the people vote him a 1/2 percent sales tax is pure power grab.

One issue I have noticed (primarily split among new immigrants and born in the US people, but not entirely so) is that new immigrants (legal or not) deserve representation and respect from existing governmental organizations. I have heard it go so far as to be illegal aliens should be able to vote for city council and school board positions. A scary thought, but one that is on the minds of many people in the South East area of LA County.

Posted by: Bill at March 22, 2006 10:32 PM

Update: The general feeling among the cops I've spoken to, is that the tow companies in Maywood did not pay off the right people in town, so by eliminating parking citations and such, the income of the tow companies will be reduced as a punishment.

No real confirmation on my part, but an interesting point of view.

Posted by: Bill at March 23, 2006 03:13 PM

Well, that's the last straw. I'm never going to Mayber -- er, Maywood again!

Posted by: Cardinal Martini at March 23, 2006 04:47 PM

Bill, yes, I admit I was making some academic legal points--and indulging in some wishful thinking--that go well beyond the political realities on the ground, with which I'm fairly familiar (having worked in the LA DA's office, even if only as a summer clerk).

Posted by: Dave J at March 23, 2006 08:46 PM